Updated various dependencies (Kotlin 1.50.0) and AssertJ 3.19.0. Fixed issue#3 reported by hankem where usingRecursiveComparison() was not considered a complex transformation.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -31,7 +31,11 @@ public class TwistedAssertions {
|
||||
assertThat(bar).isEqualTo(foo);
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(4).isEqualTo(number).isNotEqualTo(number * 2);
|
||||
assertThat(4).usingDefaultComparator().isGreaterThanOrEqualTo(number);
|
||||
assertThat(4).usingRecursiveComparison().isGreaterThanOrEqualTo(number);
|
||||
assertThat(4).usingComparator(Comparator.reverseOrder()).isGreaterThanOrEqualTo(number);
|
||||
assertThat(4).usingComparatorForFields().isGreaterThanOrEqualTo(number);
|
||||
assertThat(4).usingComparatorForType(Integer::compare).isGreaterThanOrEqualTo(number);
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(String.class).isEqualTo(Class.forName("java.lang.String"));
|
||||
assertThat("XX").matches(Pattern.compile(".."));
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,7 +31,11 @@ public class TwistedAssertions {
|
||||
assertThat(bar).isEqualTo(foo);
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(4).isEqualTo(number).isNotEqualTo(number * 2);
|
||||
assertThat(4).usingDefaultComparator().isGreaterThanOrEqualTo(number);
|
||||
assertThat(4).usingRecursiveComparison().isGreaterThanOrEqualTo(number);
|
||||
assertThat(4).usingComparator(Comparator.reverseOrder()).isGreaterThanOrEqualTo(number);
|
||||
assertThat(4).usingComparatorForFields().isGreaterThanOrEqualTo(number);
|
||||
assertThat(4).usingComparatorForType(Integer::compare).isGreaterThanOrEqualTo(number);
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(String.class).isEqualTo(Class.forName("java.lang.String"));
|
||||
assertThat("XX").matches(Pattern.compile(".."));
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user