chrisly42/cajon-plugin
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 4 Pull Requests 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Extended documentation about assumeThat() preconditions.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Chris Hodges 2019-05-16 20:06:14 +02:00
parent 7133c55710
commit e797dc2515
1 changed files with 4 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
README.md
View File

@ -372,8 +372,11 @@ You can toggle the various inspections in the Settings/Editor/Inspections in the
Currently, the quickfix may lose some comments during operation. The other branch of the ```if``` statement Currently, the quickfix may lose some comments during operation. The other branch of the ```if``` statement
will be inlined (blocks with declarations will remain a code block due to variable scope). will be inlined (blocks with declarations will remain a code block due to variable scope).
The quickfix will only work with AssertJ >= 2.9.0 (for 2.x releases) or >= 3.9.0 (for 3.x releases).
The generated ```assumeThat()``` statement could be optimized further (similar to ```assertThat()```). The generated ```assumeThat()``` statement could be optimized further (similar to ```assertThat()```), but
there is currently no support in Cajon for this (you could rename the method to ```assertThat()``` optimize it
and turn it back into ```assumeThat()``` in the end).
Example: Example: