Added minimal docs and screenshot.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c0e2da6c38
commit
1620f18e37
72
README.md
72
README.md
@ -1,2 +1,70 @@
|
|||||||
# mc68000-asm-plugin
|
# MC68000 Assembly Language Plugin [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.com/chrisly42/mc68000-asm-plugin.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.com/chrisly42/mc68000-asm-plugin) [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/repos/github/chrisly42/mc68000-asm-plugin/badge.svg?branch=master)](https://coveralls.io/github/chrisly42/mc68000-asm-plugin?branch=master)
|
||||||
Jetbrains IDE plugin for MC68000 assembly language
|
|
||||||
|
_MC68000 Assembly Language Plugin_ is plugin for Jetbrains IDEs (CLion, IntelliJ, etc.).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
![Example Syntax Highlighting](docs/syntaxhighlighting.png "Example Syntax Highlighting")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Purpose
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This plugin delivers support for MC68000 assembly language files ([VAsm](http://sun.hasenbraten.de/vasm/) / DevPac-Style).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It adds a language parser with syntax highlighting, referencing and refactoring support, and a few more features.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I'm an Amiga retro democoder, and the lack of a plugin for M68k was the motivation to write one. Also, diving deep into custom language plugins has a steep
|
||||||
|
learning curve.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When I started the plugin in July 2021, I was not aware of the [M68k plugin efforts by Jetbrains employee Yann Cébron](https://github.com/YannCebron/m68kplugin)
|
||||||
|
who has been working on the same topic for quite some time. At the time of writing, his plugin however, has not been release yet. Nevertheless, it has a lot of
|
||||||
|
awesome features and is pretty advanced. Check it out. You can install both plugins at the same time and see what suits you more.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Big kudos to Yann -- a few features were _inspired_ by his code.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
My plugin, on the other hand, is still pretty basic and is the result of about a week's effort. I released a really early first version it because I think
|
||||||
|
it's "good enough" to get started, and I can return to demo coding with its current state.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Features
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Parser / Lexer for MC68000 (yes, only 68000 right now!) assembly language files in VAsm / DevPac style
|
||||||
|
- Syntax highlighting and Color Settings Page (you should really modify the color settings to your likings!)
|
||||||
|
- Mnemonics code completion
|
||||||
|
- Symbols / Labels code completion
|
||||||
|
- References / Refactoring support for local and global labels, and symbol assignments.
|
||||||
|
- Brace matching
|
||||||
|
- Quote handler
|
||||||
|
- Goto Symbol support
|
||||||
|
- Structure view
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Known issues
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Performance is not optimal yet (no stub index).
|
||||||
|
- No referencing of macro invocations and macro definitions.
|
||||||
|
- `Find Usages` always shows _"Unclassified"_ though it shouldn't.
|
||||||
|
- Macro definitions may cause syntax errors when using backslash arguments.
|
||||||
|
- Macro invocations are not yet evaluated, thus no referencing to symbols defined via macros (e.g. `STRUCT`).
|
||||||
|
- No support for includes. Scoping is for global symbols and labels is currently the whole project.
|
||||||
|
- No support for register replacement (e.g. registers replaced by `EQUR` or `EQURL` will cause syntax errors)
|
||||||
|
- While the Lexer supports the -spaces option (where a space introduces a comment), this cannot be configured yet.
|
||||||
|
- No support for other processor instructions, FPU or 68020+ address modes.
|
||||||
|
- No semantic checking for allowed address modes or data widths yet.
|
||||||
|
- Unit Test coverage is not as good as it could be (ahem).
|
||||||
|
- Missing but planned features:
|
||||||
|
- Macro definition and evaluation on invocation
|
||||||
|
- Folding
|
||||||
|
- Semantic inspections
|
||||||
|
- Quick fixes
|
||||||
|
- Formatter + Code Style Settings
|
||||||
|
- Register use analysis (but this only makes sense after macro evaluation)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Development notice
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This plugin has been written in Kotlin 1.5.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It is probably the only plugin (besides [Cajon](https://github.com/chrisly42/cajon-plugin) from the same author) that uses JUnit 5 Jupiter for unit testing so
|
||||||
|
far (or at least the only one I'm aware of ;) ). The IntelliJ framework actually uses the JUnit 3 TestCase for plugin testing, and it took me quite a while to
|
||||||
|
make it work with JUnit 5. Feel free to use the code (in package ```de.platon42.intellij.jupiter```) for your projects (with attribution).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Changelog
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### V0.1 (20-Jun-21)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Initial release.
|
BIN
docs/syntaxhighlighting.png
Normal file
BIN
docs/syntaxhighlighting.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 91 KiB |
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user